OIA 14.53-72

Observations
• Who: Jesus, the high priest, all the chief priests, elders, law teachers, Peter, gaurds, many false witnesses, the Christ, Son of Man, servant girl, those standing near, rooster;
• When: late night/early morning on
• Where: High Priest’s chamber and courtyard;
• What: Jesus tried, condemned, and humiliated by the Sanhedrin, beaten by the gaurds; Peter’s covert reconnaissance and denial.
• Repeated words: witness 7x in various forms;
• Contrasts: Israel’s’ official leadership/unjust trial; multiple accusations/Jesus’ silence; mocked about prophecy/Jesus’ prophecy about Peter fulfilled; High Priest’s mocking question/Jesus’ truthful answer; Israel’s elite leadership/spitting and hitting; Jesus’ witness/Peter’s denial
• Connections: religious leaders’ murder conspiracy (3.6; death predictions in 8.31 and 10.33; 11.18); last supper predictions of betrayal and abandonment (14.18, 27); The Christ (1.1, 8.29, 9.41, 12.35, 13.21, 15.32); Son of man (multiple); coming in the clouds (13.26);
• Responses to Jesus: rigged trial; false witness; condemnation; personal degradation; beating; denial.

Interpretation
• The contrast between the kingdom of God proclaimed and modeled by Jesus and the Jewish religious leadership is shocking. The elite leadership of Israel conducts this sham of a trial violating not only any semblance of justice but also violation the festival of Passover. Can Mark make a more persuasive case for Jesus’ rejection of the temple and inauguration of God’s true Kingdom? Perhaps not!
• Note that this story is a classic Markan sandwich – a story within a story that serves to emphasize Mark’s narrative focus, in this case witness. The contrasts between the Sanhedrin’s and the lying witness and Jesus silence followed by truthful witness is stunning. The contrast between Jesus’ bold witness and Peter’s denial is heart wrenching.
• After three years of public ministry not even the liars can make any charges against Jesus stick. This is an amazing confirmation of Jesus’ lifestyle and character.
• Mark does not record Jesus saying verse 38 anywhere in his narrative. The closest thing to this is Jesus’ statement in 13.2.
• Why then does Mark include this one charge that becomes the turning point of this despicable sham of a trial? This is in fact the fulcrum of Jesus’ conflict with Israel’s religious leadership: the Temple. The temple was the very essence of Judaism
• But Jesus’ kingdom is not contained or constrained by human effort and accomplishment. Rather Jesus IS the temple, he IS the focal point of worship. And by answering I AM Jesus makes this crystal clear to his accusers. Jesus was not killed because he claimed to be the messiah, but because he claimed to be God’s son.
• Peter does in fact risk his life and makes an attempt to follow Jesus to his death. He is the only one of Jesus’ followers in the courtyard; he has infiltrated to the very heart of enemy territory. He may in fact have in mind an attempt to rescue Jesus from the clutches of the Sanhedrin. Instead he denies Jesus in the strongest possible cursing language.

Application
• Jesus, not the Temple is the focal point of worship.
• Jesus’ prophecy comes true.
• We do not have the power within ourselves to witness.